[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15974562#comment-15974562
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3704:
--------------------------------------

Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1677#discussion_r112190651
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PutDatabaseRecord.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,1067 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.nifi.processors.standard;
    +
    +import org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.EventDriven;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.InputRequirement;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.InputRequirement.Requirement;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.ReadsAttribute;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.documentation.CapabilityDescription;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.documentation.SeeAlso;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.documentation.Tags;
    +import org.apache.nifi.annotation.lifecycle.OnScheduled;
    +import org.apache.nifi.components.AllowableValue;
    +import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor;
    +import org.apache.nifi.dbcp.DBCPService;
    +import org.apache.nifi.expression.AttributeExpression;
    +import org.apache.nifi.flowfile.FlowFile;
    +import org.apache.nifi.logging.ComponentLog;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.AbstractProcessor;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessContext;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessSession;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.Relationship;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.ProcessException;
    +import org.apache.nifi.processor.util.StandardValidators;
    +import org.apache.nifi.serialization.MalformedRecordException;
    +import org.apache.nifi.serialization.RecordReader;
    +import org.apache.nifi.serialization.RowRecordReaderFactory;
    +import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.Record;
    +import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.RecordField;
    +import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.RecordSchema;
    +
    +import java.io.IOException;
    +import java.io.InputStream;
    +import java.sql.Connection;
    +import java.sql.DatabaseMetaData;
    +import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
    +import java.sql.ResultSet;
    +import java.sql.ResultSetMetaData;
    +import java.sql.SQLException;
    +import java.sql.Statement;
    +import java.util.ArrayList;
    +import java.util.Collections;
    +import java.util.HashMap;
    +import java.util.HashSet;
    +import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
    +import java.util.List;
    +import java.util.Map;
    +import java.util.Set;
    +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
    +import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
    +import java.util.stream.IntStream;
    +
    +
    +@EventDriven
    +@InputRequirement(Requirement.INPUT_REQUIRED)
    +@Tags({"sql", "record", "convert", "jdbc", "put", "database"})
    +@SeeAlso({ConvertJSONToSQL.class, PutSQL.class})
    +@CapabilityDescription("The PutDatabaseRecord processor uses a specified 
RecordReader to input (possibly multiple) records from an incoming flow file. 
These records are translated to SQL "
    +        + "statements and executed as a single batch. If any errors occur, 
the flow file is routed to failure or retry, and if the records are transmitted 
successfully, the incoming flow file is "
    +        + "routed to success.  The type of statement executed by the 
processor is specified via the Statement Type property, which accepts some 
hard-coded values such as INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE, "
    +        + "as well as 'Use statement.type Attribute', which causes the 
processor to get the statement type from a flow file attribute.")
    +@ReadsAttribute(attribute = PutDatabaseRecord.STATEMENT_TYPE_ATTRIBUTE, 
description = "If 'Use statement.type Attribute' is selected for the Statement 
Type property, the value of this attribute "
    +        + "will be used to determine the type of statement (INSERT, 
UPDATE, DELETE, SQL, etc.) to generate and execute.")
    +public class PutDatabaseRecord extends AbstractProcessor {
    +
    +    static final String UPDATE_TYPE = "UPDATE";
    +    static final String INSERT_TYPE = "INSERT";
    +    static final String DELETE_TYPE = "DELETE";
    +    static final String SQL_TYPE = "SQL";   // Not an allowable value in 
the Statement Type property, must be set by attribute
    +    static final String USE_ATTR_TYPE = "Use statement.type Attribute";
    +
    +    static final String STATEMENT_TYPE_ATTRIBUTE = "statement.type";
    +
    +    static final AllowableValue IGNORE_UNMATCHED_FIELD = new 
AllowableValue("Ignore Unmatched Fields", "Ignore Unmatched Fields",
    +            "Any field in the document that cannot be mapped to a column 
in the database is ignored");
    +    static final AllowableValue FAIL_UNMATCHED_FIELD = new 
AllowableValue("Fail", "Fail",
    --- End diff --
    
    I agree, I copied these from ConvertJSONToSQL, but can improve this here.


> Add PutDatabaseRecord processor
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-3704
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3704
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Matt Burgess
>            Assignee: Matt Burgess
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> With the inclusion of NIFI-1280, which added Controller Services for 
> RecordReaders and RecordWriters, we could now support a processor that reads 
> records in, generates SQL statements for those records (with a specified verb 
> such as INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, etc.), and can execute all the records in one 
> flow file as a batch. This would allow the processor to use a single 
> PreparedStatement and, for a flow file containing multiple records, would be 
> able to execute them all at once. This is in contrast to PutSQL which handles 
> batches across flow files (if fragmented transactions are enabled) or with a 
> discrete set (by taking at most a specified number of flow files at a time).
> This processor (called PutDatabaseRecord) would effectively act like the 
> combination of ConvertJSONToSQL and PutSQL, with the added features of being 
> able to take records in an arbitrary format (given that there is a 
> RecordReader implementation for that format) such as Avro, JSON, CSV, etc. 
> and execute all the statements for the flow file at once.
> Another improvement upon what can be done in ConvertJSONToSQL would be to 
> support BEGIN, COMMIT, and SQL verbs. This could be accomplished by adding an 
> AllowableValue to the dropdown, letting the user select "Use statement.type 
> Attribute". If this was selected, then the verb would be expected to be in 
> the value of the "statement.type" attribute of the incoming flow file.  Note 
> that this may supercede or deprecate the need for NIFI-3676, unless this 
> capability is also desired for that processor.
> For BEGIN and COMMIT verbs, the contents of the record(s) are not needed, as 
> the type itself should be enough to generate the appropriate SQL commands. 
> For the "SQL" Statement type, the processor could either expect the flow file 
> to contain a SQL statement (so the RecordReader would not be used), or it 
> could expect a field called "sql" that contains the SQL statement as its 
> value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to