[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16057831#comment-16057831
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4095:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1931

    NIFI-4095

    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/alopresto/nifi NIFI-4095

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1931.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1931
    
----
commit 6e3029cd91cbaa94860b0f2018db22a05a8ff019
Author: Andy LoPresto <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-06-20T20:23:19Z

    NIFI-4095 Changed minimum capture group count in ExtractText from 1 to 0.
    Added unit test and removed obsolete test.

commit f87a6789dca9f7612ae9faeb927b06e39317fe27
Author: Andy LoPresto <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-06-21T16:49:00Z

    NIFI-4095 Added custom validation to enforce capture group if "include 
capture group 0" is false.
    Added unit test.

----


> ExtractText should not require a capture group in every regular expression
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4095
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4095
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Andy LoPresto
>            Assignee: Andy LoPresto
>              Labels: extracttext, regular_expression, validation
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> The {{ExtractText}} processor currently validates every regular expression 
> and requires that it contain "between 1 and 40 capture groups". This seems to 
> be a design decision, as the values are hardcoded into the 
> [validator|https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExtractText.java#L262-L262],
>  but there are valid regular expressions that do not need an explicit capture 
> group (especially when the expression is small and the full expression is the 
> desired match). This results in unnecessary duplicate matches ("some_attr" 
> and "some_attr.1" being identical). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to