[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16076403#comment-16076403
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4155:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user ijokarumawak opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1984

    NIFI-4155: Expand EnforceOrder capability to cluster

    - Added 'Ordering Scope' to specify how it should manage state, to choose 
from local and cluster.
    - Avoid unnecessary status update if it does not make any progress, only 
update it when order proceeds.
    - If updating state fails, due to it is already updated by other nodes, 
rollback the session to process the same FlowFiles again.
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [x] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ijokarumawak/nifi nifi-4155

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1984.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1984
    
----
commit 11fa5ff13b5fcc5b8f5b1de577b8a061cc4ca174
Author: Koji Kawamura <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-07-06T11:53:23Z

    NIFI-4155: Expand EnforceOrder capability to cluster
    
    - Added 'Ordering Scope' to specify how it should manage state, to choose 
from local and cluster.
    - Avoid unnecessary status update if it does not make any progress, only 
update it when order proceeds.
    - If updating state fails, due to it is already updated by other nodes, 
rollback the session to process the same FlowFiles again.

----


> Expand EnforceOrder capability to cluster
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4155
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4155
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Koji Kawamura
>            Assignee: Koji Kawamura
>
> Currently, EnforceOrder is able to enforce FlowFile ordering within a NiFi 
> node, and it uses local managed state to track progress.
> If it is configurable which state management to use from Local and Cluster, 
> EnforceOrder would be also able to enforce ordering across cluster with 
> cluster scope state management. It would be useful for some use-cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to