[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16170985#comment-16170985
 ] 

Koji Kawamura commented on NIFI-190:
------------------------------------

Hi [~Minmin_Sydney],

If I understand your use-case correctly, following approach might work:

Requirements:
# FF(D) waits for FF(A) and FF(B)
# FF(E) waits for FF(B) and FF(C)

Solution sammary:
Use two different Signal Identifier for FF(D) and FF(E), e.g. Signal(D) and 
Signal(E).

Flow (I assume you have control which FlowFile go through which route):
# FF(D) --> Wait: Signal(D), "Target Signal Count" = 2, "Signal Counter Name" = 
blank (so that it uses the total count, i.e: wait for A + B = 2)
# FF(E) --> Wait: Signal(E), "Target Signal Count" = 2, "Signal Counter Name" = 
blank (so that it uses the total count, i.e: wait for B + C = 2)
# FF(A) --> Notify: Signal(D), "Signal Counter Name" = "A"
# FF(C) --> Notify: Signal(E), "Signal Counter Name" = "C"
# FF(B) --> Notify: Signal(D), "Signal Counter Name" = "B" --> Notify: 
Signal(E), "Signal Counter Name" = "B". Important to use two different Notify 
processors to increment counter for Signal(D) and Signal(E) here.

How do you think?

> Wait/Notify processors
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-190
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-190
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Joseph Gresock
>            Assignee: Joseph Gresock
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>         Attachments: Wait_Notify_template.xml
>
>
> Our team has developed a set of processors for the following use case:
> * Format A needs to be sent to Endpoint A
> * Format B needs to be sent to Endpoint B, but should not proceed until A has 
> reached Endpoint A.  We most commonly have this restriction when Endpoint B 
> requires some output of Endpoint A.
> The proposed Wait/Notify processors enable this functionality:
> * Wait: routes files to the 'wait' relationship until a matching Release 
> Signal Identifier is found in the distributed map cache.  Then routes them to 
> 'success' (unless they have expired)
> * Notify: stores a Release Signal Identifier in the distributed map cache, 
> optionally with attributes to copy to the outgoing matching Wait flow files.
> An example:
> Wait is configured with Release Signal Attribute = "$\{myId}". Its 'wait' 
> relationship routes back onto itself.
>     flowFile 1 \{ myId : "123" }
>     comes into Wait processor
>     Wait checks the distributed cache map for "123", doesn't find it, and is 
> routed to the 'wait' relationship
> Notify is configured with Release Signal Attribute = "$\{myId}"
>     flowFile 2 \{ myId : "123" }
>     comes in to Notify processor
>     Notify puts an entry in the map for "123" with any other attributes from 
> flowFile2
> Next time flowFile 1 is processed by Wait...
>     Finds an entry for "123"
>     Removes that entry from the map
>     Copies attributes to flowFile 1
>     Sends flowFile 1 out the success relationship
> Notify will optionally cache attributes in the distributed map, as determined 
> by a regex property.  This is what allows the output of Endpoint A to pass to 
> Endpoint B, above.  Wait also allows conflicting attributes from the cache to 
> either be replaced or kept, depending on property configuration.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to