[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16174655#comment-16174655
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4395:
--------------------------------------
GitHub user yjhyjhyjh0 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2166
NIFI-4395 - GenerateTableFetch can't fetch column type by state after…
… instance reboot
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:
### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
in the commit message?
- [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target
branch (typically master)?
- [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
### For code changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
- [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
- [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
### For documentation related changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in
which it is rendered?
### Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/yjhyjhyjh0/nifi NIFI-4395
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2166.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #2166
----
commit faf6f2dfc15ef1900b6b868e19b90e39d934d07f
Author: Deon Huang <[email protected]>
Date: 2017-09-21T07:34:00Z
NIFI-4395 - GenerateTableFetch can't fetch column type by state after
instance reboot
----
> GenerateTableFetch can't fetch column type by state after instance reboot
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-4395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4395
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Deon Huang
> Assignee: Deon Huang
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: GenerateTableFetch_Exception.png
>
>
> The problem can easily be reproduce.
> Once GenerateTableFetch store state and encounter NiFi instance reboot.
> (Dynamic naming table by expression language)
> The exception will occur.
> The error in source code is list below.
> ```
> if (type == null) {
> // This shouldn't happen as we are populating columnTypeMap when the
> processor is scheduled or when the first maximum is observed
> throw new IllegalArgumentException("No column type found for: " +
> colName);
> }
> ```
> When this situation happened. The FlowFile will also be grab and can't
> release or observed.
> Processor can't grab existing column type from *columnTypeMap* through
> instance reboot.
> Hence will inevidible get this exception, rollback FlowFile and never success.
> QueryDatabaseTable processor will not encounter this exception due to it
> setup(context) every time,
> While GenerateTableFetch will not pass the condition and thus try to fetch
> column type from 0 length columnTypeMap.
> ---
> if (!isDynamicTableName && !isDynamicMaxValues) {
> super.setup(context);
> }
> ---
> I can take the issue if it is recognize as bug.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
