[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16249998#comment-16249998
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3155:
--------------------------------------

Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2253
  
    Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.


> Remote Group Port UUIDs
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-3155
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3155
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Matt Gilman
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Remote Group Ports assume the UUID of the port on the target instance. This 
> is critical for retaining which port the connection is associated with. 
> However, this is problematic for any flow which contains multiple RPGs 
> pointed to the same target instance. Associating the underlying component 
> when only an ID is known (ie provenance) is impossible as the UUID is 
> ambiguous.
> This issue also exists for self-referencing RPGs but is mitigated with extra 
> logic around these troublesome scenarios. For instance, we can differentiate 
> the Remote Group Port from the Root Group Port of a self-referencing RPG by 
> looking at the component type. However, this isn't possible with multiple 
> RPGs referencing the same target instance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to