[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268155#comment-16268155
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4256:
--------------------------------------

Github user jvwing commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2291#discussion_r153396888
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-aws-bundle/nifi-aws-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/aws/s3/PutS3Object.java
 ---
    @@ -154,6 +155,14 @@
             .defaultValue(StorageClass.Standard.name())
             .build();
     
    +
    +    public static final PropertyDescriptor PUT_ENRICHMENT_SERVICE = new 
PropertyDescriptor.Builder()
    +            .name("Put Enrichment Service")
    --- End diff --
    
    Same request for machine-readable name and human-readable displayName.


> Add support for all AWS S3 Encryption Options
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4256
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4256
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Franco
>              Labels: aws, aws-s3, security
>
> NiFi currently only supportsĀ SSE-S3 encryption (AES256).
> Support needs to be added for:
> * SSE-S3
> * SSE-KMS
> * SSE-C
> * CSE-KMS CMK
> * CSE-Master Key
> With all of the appropriate configuration options and such that SSE is 
> available only for PutS3Object whilst CSE is available also for FetchS3Object.
> Given that this will add another 20 or so UI properties the intention is to 
> split it into a Client Side Encryption Service and Server Side Encryption 
> Service. This will allow users to reuse "encryption" across different 
> workflows.
> Existing flows using the Server Side Encryption option will still work as is 
> but will be overridden if a service is added.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to