[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16279112#comment-16279112
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4664:
--------------------------------------
GitHub user joewitt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2319
NIFI-4664, NIFI-4662, NIFI-4660, NIFI-4659 moved tests which are timi…
…ng/threading/network dependent and brittle to integration tests and
un-ignored tests that are IT
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:
### For all changes:
- [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
in the commit message?
- [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
- [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target
branch (typically master)?
- [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
### For code changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
- [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
- [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
### For documentation related changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in
which it is rendered?
### Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/joewitt/incubator-nifi NIFI-4664
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2319.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #2319
----
commit 9ef4540a42efc3bb8b07f8dc9082081edd81af14
Author: joewitt <[email protected]>
Date: 2017-12-05T19:44:07Z
NIFI-4664, NIFI-4662, NIFI-4660, NIFI-4659 moved tests which are
timing/threading/network dependent and brittle to integration tests and
un-ignored tests that are IT
----
> Kafka 9 processors test is brittle
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-4664
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4664
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Extensions, Tools and Build
> Environment: travis-ci
> Reporter: Joseph Witt
> Assignee: Joseph Witt
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.595 sec <<<
> FAILURE! - in org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest
> validateConsumerRetainer(org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest)
> Time elapsed: 0.457 sec <<< FAILURE!
> org.mockito.exceptions.verification.NoInteractionsWanted:
> No interactions wanted here:
> -> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer(ConsumeKafkaTest.java:205)
> But found this interaction on mock 'Mock for ConsumerPool, hashCode:
> 349420578':
> -> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> ***
> For your reference, here is the list of all invocations ([?] - means
> unverified).
> 1. -> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> 2. [?]-> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer(ConsumeKafkaTest.java:205)
> Running org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.TestPublishKafka
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.095 sec -
> in org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.TestPublishKafka
> Results :
> Failed tests:
> ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer:205
> No interactions wanted here:
> -> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer(ConsumeKafkaTest.java:205)
> But found this interaction on mock 'Mock for ConsumerPool, hashCode:
> 349420578':
> -> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> ***
> For your reference, here is the list of all invocations ([?] - means
> unverified).
> 1. -> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> 2. [?]-> at
> org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
