[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16295431#comment-16295431
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4707:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user mattyb149 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2351

    NIFI-4707: Build full component map for ID -> Name association in 
provenance reporting

    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] ~~If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
    ~~
    - [ ] ~~If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the 
main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?~~
    - [ ] ~~If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?~~
    - [ ] ~~If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition 
to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?~~
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/mattyb149/nifi NIFI-4707

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2351.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2351
    
----
commit 749d5b6b0251392e54d48d8f7673d2a87f364543
Author: Matthew Burgess <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-12-18T18:44:21Z

    NIFI-4707: Build full component map for ID -> Name association in 
provenance reporting"

----


> SiteToSiteProvenanceReportingTask does not always return component name
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4707
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4707
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Matt Burgess
>            Assignee: Matt Burgess
>
> When the SiteToSiteProvenanceReportingTask emits flow files, some of them 
> include a "componentName" field and some do not. Investigation shows that 
> only the components (except connections) in the root process group have that 
> field populated. Having this information can be very helpful to the user, 
> even though the names might be duplicated, there would be a mapping between a 
> component's ID and its name. At the very least the behavior (i.e. component 
> name being available) should be consistent.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to