[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16308670#comment-16308670
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4724:
--------------------------------------

Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2362#discussion_r159309499
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-kafka-bundle/nifi-kafka-0-10-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/kafka/pubsub/PublisherLease.java
 ---
    @@ -71,9 +72,18 @@ void publish(final FlowFile flowFile, final InputStream 
flowFileContent, final b
                 tracker = new InFlightMessageTracker();
             }
     
    -        try (final StreamDemarcator demarcator = new 
StreamDemarcator(flowFileContent, demarcatorBytes, maxMessageSize)) {
    +        try {
                 byte[] messageContent;
    -            try {
    +            if (demarcatorBytes == null || demarcatorBytes.length == 0) {
    +                // Send FlowFile content as it is, to support sending 0 
byte message.
    +                final ByteArrayOutputStream bos = new 
ByteArrayOutputStream();
    --- End diff --
    
    This is expensive, as it will create a new ByteArrayOutputStream for each 
FlowFile, then constantly re-copy that byte array each time that it needs to 
expand the internal buffer. Instead, I would suggest we just do something like:
    ```
    byte[] messageContent = new byte[(int) flowFile.getSize()];
    StreamUtils.fillBuffer(flowFileContent, messageContent);
    ```
    Even that, though, is going to create a good bit of garbage that we can 
avoid. A better approach might actually be to use a BlockingQueue<byte[]> and 
call poll() on that. If we get a byte[] back, then use it. If not, then create 
a new byte[maxMessageSize] and then use that. At the end, add the byte[] back 
to the queue. Then in the close() method clear the queue in case the processor 
is re-scheduled with fewer threads. This is nice because it means that we can 
avoid constantly creating these byte[] objects, which can cause stress on the 
GC.
    
    That being said, if you think it's out of scope for this ticket, I would 
recommend just creating the byte[] inline as described above and then we can 
create a new JIRA to optimize this.


> Publish kafka processors fails with FlowFileHandlingException if the flow 
> file is empty
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4724
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4724
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Mahesh Nayak
>            Assignee: Koji Kawamura
>
> 1. Construct the flow GenerateFlowFile --> PublishKafka --> PutFile
> 2. In GenerateFlowFile set the "File Size" to 0B.
> 3. Start the flow.
> Result : Kafka processor throws below exception
> {code:None}
> 2017-12-27 02:49:21,933 WARN [Timer-Driven Process Thread-9] 
> o.a.n.c.t.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask Administratively Yielding 
> PublishKafka_0_10[id=95dbc77a-0160-1000-0000-000069761c4e] due to uncaught 
> Exception: org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.FlowFileHandlingException: 
> StandardFlowFileRecord[uuid=4d6cb989-b6a7-4129-9dfc-1598ee2b3937,claim=,offset=0,name=7061091998478433,size=0]
>  transfer relationship not specified
> 2017-12-27 02:49:21,933 WARN [Timer-Driven Process Thread-9] 
> o.a.n.c.t.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask
> org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.FlowFileHandlingException: 
> StandardFlowFileRecord[uuid=4d6cb989-b6a7-4129-9dfc-1598ee2b3937,claim=,offset=0,name=7061091998478433,size=0]
>  transfer relationship not specified
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.repository.StandardProcessSession.checkpoint(StandardProcessSession.java:251)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.repository.StandardProcessSession.commit(StandardProcessSession.java:321)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.processor.AbstractProcessor.onTrigger(AbstractProcessor.java:28)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.StandardProcessorNode.onTrigger(StandardProcessorNode.java:1120)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.tasks.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.call(ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.java:147)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.tasks.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.call(ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.java:47)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.scheduling.TimerDrivenSchedulingAgent$1.run(TimerDrivenSchedulingAgent.java:128)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
>         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to