Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2133
@gresockj Sorry I must have not seen your comment on here. This PR has been
around for quite a while. However, I wonder if
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416 makes this no longer relevant? I
recently implemented a new version of the write-ahead log due to an issue that
was discovered (NIFI-4774). The new implementation actually avoids using
multiple partitions at all so this, I believe, becomes a non-issue. If you
agree, then is it okay for you to close the PR? If you don't agree, can you
help me understand?
---
