[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16416336#comment-16416336
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5022:
--------------------------------------

Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2588
  
    Notes:
    
    - I am still validating against aws service/petstore
    - I have implemented proxy user/password in these classes, there is another 
PR that adds it to the base, but I didn't want to wait and didn't want to 
expand scope.  I did however want all the tests from InvokeHttp to run.  This 
will have to be addressed



> Create an AWS Gateway Web API version of InvokeHTTP
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5022
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5022
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Otto Fowler
>            Assignee: Otto Fowler
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently the AWS processors are lacking support to call AWS Gateway Web Apis.
> Nifi should provide support for calling this apis, including support for all 
> the same authentication methods available to the other AWS client processors.
> Since these APIs are web services, their expected use would require an 
> interface more like InvokeHTTP however, than the specialized interfaces for 
> the other AWS Services.
> What would be required then would be a new AWS Processor that exposed the 
> same interface as InvokeHTTP, but backed by the AWS client support ( and of 
> course modified to fit the differences between the OK http client and the 
> Amazon client ).
> This new processor should be able to pass all the applicable tests available 
> in the InvokeHttp test suite.
> The processor should also be factored in such a way as to make it possible 
> for the creation of custom processors for specific apis
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to