[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16452180#comment-16452180
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5119:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user jomach opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2656

    NIFI-5119: Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive 
Informations on Destination

      * Fix missing sensetive information.
      * missing unit test
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jomach/nifi master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2656.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2656
    
----
commit 07f4ccb2cf4f25922ae6f1dade3ff71da9143433
Author: Jorge Machado <jorgewilson.machado@...>
Date:   2018-04-25T12:37:20Z

    NIFI-5119
      * Fix missing sensetive information.
      * missing unit test

----


> Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on 
> Destination
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5119
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Variable Registry
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.6.0
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Jorge Machado
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> When pulling changes from registry if a sensitive variable is set then it 
> gets reset to its default. 
> I have found out a use case that destroys the complete concept of the 
> Registry. 
>  # Setup a flow with a sensitive field on Nifi Server A.
>  # Push that to Registry
>  # Pull the Flow in  Nifi Server B.  (this is expected to be reseted because 
> is the first time) 
>  # Make changes on Nifi Server B and Push
>  # Pull the changes from Nifi Server A. 
>  
> On Step 5 the sensitive Information from Nifi Server A get's deleted.
> This breaks the whole concept IMHO.
> Relates to : NIFI-5028



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to