[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16470862#comment-16470862
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5113:
--------------------------------------
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r187395204
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/pom.xml
---
@@ -86,12 +86,23 @@
<artifactId>avro</artifactId>
<version>1.8.1</version>
</dependency>
+ <dependency>
--- End diff --
I think the more appropriate dependency to use here is
```
<dependency>
<groupId>net.java.dev.stax-utils</groupId>
<artifactId>stax-utils</artifactId>
<version>20070216</version>
</dependency>
```
No?
Either way, both have a dependency on BEA's JSR173, which has the following
license: https://www.calculate-linux.org/packages/licenses/bea.ri.jsr173 - I'm
not entirely sure if this is permissible in Apache land and if it is, how to
properly document it. That said, it appears that jsr 173 is now part of java
and so that dependency I think can be excluded. I changed the pom as follows:
```
<dependency>
<groupId>net.java.dev.stax-utils</groupId>
<artifactId>stax-utils</artifactId>
<version>20070216</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.bea.xml</groupId>
<artifactId>jsr173-ri</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
```
And all appears to work just fine. Thoughts?
> Add XML record writer
> ---------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-5113
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5113
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Johannes Peter
> Assignee: Johannes Peter
> Priority: Major
>
> Corresponding writer for the XML record reader
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
