[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16475401#comment-16475401
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4199:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user ijokarumawak opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2704

    NIFI-4199: Consistent proxy support across components

    - Added ProxyConfigurationService to manage centralized proxy
    configurations
    - Adopt ProxyConfigurationService at FTP and HTTP processors
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [x] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ijokarumawak/nifi nifi-4199

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2704.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2704
    
----
commit 7c890e97977b5f956d53a48e19dbd3e580a8f664
Author: Koji Kawamura <ijokarumawak@...>
Date:   2018-05-15T05:52:39Z

    NIFI-4199: Consistent proxy support across components
    
    - Added ProxyConfigurationService to manage centralized proxy
    configurations
    - Adopt ProxyConfigurationService at FTP and HTTP processors

----


> NiFi processors should be able to share proxy settings
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4199
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4199
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andre F de Miranda
>            Assignee: Koji Kawamura
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, configuring proxy settings for NiFi processors may be a tedious 
> process that requires the DFM to set proxy settings on individual processors. 
> This leads to:
> * Duplication of work
> * Management overhead (as password must be changed on multiple locations)
> * Lower security (as proxy credentials must be known by "n" DFMs)
> Ideally, NiFi should offer a way to minimise duplication of work by offering 
> a something similar to the Standard SSL Context services. This way, the DFM 
> could set the proxy settings once an all authorised users could tap into 
> those settings.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to