[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16477689#comment-16477689
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5200:
--------------------------------------
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2707
> Nested ProcessSession.read resulting in outer stream being closed.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-5200
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5200
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Framework
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Peter Radden
> Assignee: Mark Payne
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Consider this example processor:
> {code:java}
> FlowFile ff1 = session.write(session.create(),
> (out) -> { out.write(new byte[]{ 'A', 'B' }); });
> FlowFile ff2 = session.write(session.create(),
> (out) -> { out.write('C'); });
> session.read(ff1,
> (in1) -> {
> int a = in1.read();
> session.read(ff2, (in2) -> { int c = in2.read(); });
> int b = in1.read();
> });
> session.transfer(ff1, REL_SUCCESS);
> session.transfer(ff2, REL_SUCCESS);{code}
> The expectation is that a='A', b='B' and c='C'.
> The actual result is that the final call to in1.read() throws due to the
> underlying stream being closed by the previous session.read on ff2.
> A workaround seems to be to pass the optional parameter to session.read of
> allowSessionStreamManagement=true.
> Is this expected that nested reads used in this way will not work?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
