[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16500991#comment-16500991
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5209:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2761

    NIFI-5209 Removed secure hash functionality from ConfigEncryptionTool.

    This feature was added to support external integration with Apache Ambari. 
Ambari developers then discovered a problem with the joint proposal and we 
built a different way to accomplish the goal. This behavior should be removed 
so it does not go in a release and need to be supported unnecessarily. 
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/alopresto/nifi NIFI-5209

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2761.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2761
    
----
commit 51822b8569d21965c3cf91f7f1ae2758285adf44
Author: Andy LoPresto <alopresto@...>
Date:   2018-06-04T19:39:34Z

    NIFI-5209 Removed secure hash functionality from ConfigEncryptionTool.
    Removed relevant unit tests.

----


> Remove toolkit migration without password functionality
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5209
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5209
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools and Build
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.0
>            Reporter: Andy LoPresto
>            Assignee: Andy LoPresto
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: hash, key, passwords, revert, security, toolkit
>
> In NIFI-4942, new functionality was added to allow Ambari clients to perform 
> the encrypted configuration migration without providing the original password 
> or key by using a secure hash of the original credential to demonstrate 
> knowledge of that value. The Ambari team found another way on their end to 
> perform this action, and rather than allow the {{./secure_hash.key}} behavior 
> to be released and then removed at a later time, complicating our security 
> posture and potentially creating difficult support cases, it is better to 
> remove it completely before the 1.7.0 release. 
> However, it is not as simple as just backing out a few commits, as necessary 
> refactoring of the tool code also occurred at that time. I will remove this 
> feature while maintaining the improvements made to the toolkit. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to