Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2702#discussion_r197460837
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-pulsar-bundle/nifi-pulsar-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/pulsar/AbstractPulsarProcessor.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.nifi.processors.pulsar;
+
+
+import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.AbstractProcessor;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessContext;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.Relationship;
+import org.apache.nifi.pulsar.PulsarClientService;
+import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.PulsarClient;
+
+public abstract class AbstractPulsarProcessor extends AbstractProcessor {
--- End diff --
This class serves simply to define a Property Descriptor and a 5-line
convenience method. I would recommend removing the abstract class all together,
as I believe that it would keep the code more readable & maintainable.
---
