Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2834
What do you think about naming conventions consistent between the
processors that do this "incremental commit"? I added this capability to
QueryDatabaseTable under
[NIFI-4836](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4836), and not to say we
have to use my namings, but as it is in product it might be better to have the
properties and such be named and documented consistently. For example, QDT has
a single property that takes a zero value to indicate that it should wait until
all results are processed before sending the files downstream. What are your
thoughts?
---
