[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16591988#comment-16591988
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5553:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user mattyb149 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2967

    NIFI-5553: Fixed issue with rollback on result set errors

    Set the w=1 parameter on this URL to ignore whitespace changes (I indented 
a bunch of code to put it in a try/catch) and see the actual changes.
    
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/mattyb149/nifi NIFI-5553

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2967.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2967
    
----
commit 219fb80be8d1b87efd2e3f75a45366a87dc3802d
Author: Matthew Burgess <mattyb149@...>
Date:   2018-08-24T17:56:32Z

    NIFI-5553: Fixed issue with rollback on result set errors

----


> ExecuteSQL incorrectly causes session rollback rather than routing to failure
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5553
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5553
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Matt Burgess
>            Assignee: Matt Burgess
>            Priority: Major
>
> If ExecuteSQL has an incoming connection and the query executes successfully, 
> then if an error occurs while processing the result set(s), the session 
> incorrectly gets rolled back, when the expected behavior is to route the 
> incoming flow file to failure.
> After the query executes successfully, a flow file is created to contain the 
> result set.If an exception occurs after this, the original incoming flow file 
> is correctly transferred to failure, but the result set flow file has not 
> been removed. This causes the session to rollback and thus return the 
> incoming flow file to the incoming queue.
> This has been verified as a bug in NiFi 1.5.0 and the current master 
> (1.8.0-SNAPSHOT) but is working as expected in NiFi 1.2.0. I suspect this may 
> have been introduced by NIFI-3432, in any case a unit test should be added to 
> prevent regressions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to