Github user phrocker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/394#discussion_r218532216
--- Diff: LICENSE ---
@@ -1427,3 +1451,183 @@ This product bundles 'bsdiff' which is available
under a "2-clause BSD" license.
STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING
IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+ This product bundles 'Simple-Windows-Posix-Semaphore' which is available
under an Apache v2 License.
--- End diff --
I always felt this was good hygiene as a practice. Further I always thought
that Category A licenses needed to adhere to the attribution portion of the
aforementioned license. 4.d of http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 led me to
believe this is a smart inclusion. I assume there is other language that makes
this recursive attribution assumed?
---
