[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16641968#comment-16641968
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFICPP-637:
------------------------------------------

Github user phrocker commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/416#discussion_r223390733
  
    --- Diff: libminifi/include/capi/Plan.h ---
    @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ class ExecutionPlan {
         return content_repo_;
       }
     
    +  static std::shared_ptr<core::Processor> createProcessor(const 
std::string &processor_name, const std::string &name);
    --- End diff --
    
    We probably don't have a need to propagate a name since this isn't a real 
flow. Not inherently against this but we probably want to facilitate creating 
processors with a simple few commands without the need to have a level of 
indirection of naming -- this was purposeful to avoid that layer. 


> extend C API to support adding processors with configuration to existing flows
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFICPP-637
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-637
>             Project: NiFi MiNiFi C++
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Arpad Boda
>            Assignee: Arpad Boda
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>
> Create add_processor function that is able to extend a flow with new 
> processors. This new function also needs to support setting properties of the 
> new processor. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to