[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakub Dropia updated NIFI-5725:
-------------------------------
Description:
Currently, ConsumeAzureEventHub processor takes from EventData a predefined set
of SystemProperties and adds them to FlowFile attributes. But there are cases,
where SystemProperties may have contain more information (form example IoT Hub)
and would be nice to add possibility to define mapping to them via dynamic
property on processor.
The same story is with UserProperties which right now are completly ignored
and we cannot reach information included there.
I would like to propose change for this.
was:
Currently, GetAzureEventHub processor takes from EventData a predefined set of
SystemProperties and adds them to FlowFile attributes. But there are cases,
where SystemProperties may have contain more information (form example IoT Hub)
and would be nice to add possibility to define mapping to them via dynamic
property on processor.
The same story is with UserProperties which right now are completly ignored and
we cannot reach information included there.
I would like to propose change for this.
Summary: ConsumeAzureEventHub processor - add custom attribute mapping
to SystemProperties and UserProperties (was: GetAzureEventHub processor - add
custom attribute mapping to SystemProperties and UserProperties)
> ConsumeAzureEventHub processor - add custom attribute mapping to
> SystemProperties and UserProperties
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-5725
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5725
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Jakub Dropia
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently, ConsumeAzureEventHub processor takes from EventData a predefined
> set of SystemProperties and adds them to FlowFile attributes. But there are
> cases, where SystemProperties may have contain more information (form example
> IoT Hub) and would be nice to add possibility to define mapping to them via
> dynamic property on processor.
> The same story is with UserProperties which right now are completly ignored
> and we cannot reach information included there.
> I would like to propose change for this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
