Github user arpadboda commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/432#discussion_r231886506
  
    --- Diff: nanofi/src/api/nanofi.cpp ---
    @@ -323,55 +360,45 @@ int transmit_flowfile(flow_file_record *ff, 
nifi_instance *instance) {
     
     flow * create_new_flow(nifi_instance * instance) {
       auto minifi_instance_ref = 
static_cast<minifi::Instance*>(instance->instance_ptr);
    -  flow *new_flow = (flow*) malloc(sizeof(flow));
    -
    -  auto execution_plan = new 
ExecutionPlan(minifi_instance_ref->getContentRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository());
    -
    -  new_flow->plan = execution_plan;
    -
    -  return new_flow;
    +  return new flow(minifi_instance_ref->getContentRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository());
     }
     
     flow *create_flow(nifi_instance *instance, const char *first_processor) {
       if (nullptr == instance || nullptr == instance->instance_ptr) {
         return nullptr;
       }
       auto minifi_instance_ref = 
static_cast<minifi::Instance*>(instance->instance_ptr);
    -  flow *new_flow = (flow*) malloc(sizeof(flow));
    -
    -  auto execution_plan = new 
ExecutionPlan(minifi_instance_ref->getContentRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository());
     
    -  new_flow->plan = execution_plan;
    +  flow *new_flow = new flow(minifi_instance_ref->getContentRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository(), 
minifi_instance_ref->getNoOpRepository());
     
       if (first_processor != nullptr && strlen(first_processor) > 0) {
         // automatically adds it with success
    -    execution_plan->addProcessor(first_processor, first_processor);
    --- End diff --
    
    I guess that only declaring structures via the API leaves us the freedom to 
change the internal representation anyhow without breaking it. On the other 
side it's now faster than it was. 


---

Reply via email to