Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3051#discussion_r237138338
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-cassandra-bundle/nifi-cassandra-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/cassandra/AbstractCassandraProcessor.java
---
@@ -132,17 +134,25 @@
.addValidator(StandardValidators.CHARACTER_SET_VALIDATOR)
.build();
+ // Relationships
public static final Relationship REL_SUCCESS = new
Relationship.Builder()
.name("success")
.description("A FlowFile is transferred to this relationship
if the operation completed successfully.")
.build();
+
+ static final Relationship REL_ORIGINAL = new Relationship.Builder()
+ .name("original")
+ .description("All input FlowFiles that are part of a
successful query execution go here.")
+ .build();
+
public static final Relationship REL_FAILURE = new
Relationship.Builder()
.name("failure")
- .description("A FlowFile is transferred to this relationship
if the operation failed.")
+ .description("CQL query execution failed.")
--- End diff --
I'd prefer `CQL operation` rather than `query`, as PutCassandra is more of
a statement than a query, and this base processor could be used to do other
things. Technically a processor wouldn't have to use CQL although I'm not sure
of other ways to interact with Cassandra, and I think the user would be
comfortable with the term CQL to mean Cassandra, even if it didn't use CQL.
---
