Github user kislayom commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3201#discussion_r239314421
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ListFTP.java
---
@@ -35,17 +36,21 @@
import org.apache.nifi.components.ValidationResult;
import org.apache.nifi.components.state.Scope;
import org.apache.nifi.context.PropertyContext;
+import org.apache.nifi.expression.ExpressionLanguageScope;
import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessContext;
import org.apache.nifi.processor.util.list.ListedEntityTracker;
import org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.util.FileTransfer;
import org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.util.FTPTransfer;
@PrimaryNodeOnly
@TriggerSerially
-@InputRequirement(Requirement.INPUT_FORBIDDEN)
+@InputRequirement(Requirement.INPUT_ALLOWED)
--- End diff --
Sure, based on the input provided i will try to identify required changes.
The latest timestamp management part might be tricky are we required to keep
latest timestamp per path, hostname, and user wise or just the latest one ? I
have so far assumed to manage latest timestamp only for the latest. If we plan
to manages all timestamps i will need to rework on a number of things here, and
may would like to approach the problem starting with proposed design.
---
