ijokarumawak opened a new pull request #3367: NIFI-6105: Fix handling of arrays 
of records/maps in record utilities
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3367
 
 
   Hi @mattyb149 
   
   Sorry for guiding you to the wrong direction while I reviewed your PR #3353 !
   After reviewing it again, your first commit was correct. I got confused 
about my test results.
   I'm +1 with PR #3353.
   
   However, I think we should avoid having duplicate schema check logic.
   So, I created this PR, based on your 1st commit in #3353.
   I already signed and add close comment for 3353.
   If my refactoring looks good, then would you please merge these two commits 
in this PR to the master branch?
   
   Thanks!
   
   --- 
   
   Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
   
   In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
   to ensure the following steps have been taken:
   
   ### For all changes:
   - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
        in the commit message?
   
   - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
   
   - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
   
   - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
   
   ### For code changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
   - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
   - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
   
   ### For documentation related changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which 
it is rendered?
   
   ### Note:
   Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to