ijokarumawak commented on issue #3351: NIFI-2933 Remote input/output ports at any PG URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3351#issuecomment-478535171 @andrewmlim About the feedback from Matthew Clarke [posted earlier](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3351#issuecomment-477746466). All public ports are exposed to RPGs as a flat structure. ProcessGroup hierarchy is not shared to remote instances. The root process group name is the only known PG name at the S2S client side. Maybe the component name `RemoteProcessGroup` is getting a bit confusing once we allow any PG to have public port.. I wish it could have been `RemoteNiFi`. In order to share process group hierarchy, we need to alter S2S protocol. I don't think that's a good idea. Instead, we can change label text in case connection source/target is a RemoteGroupPort.  I'd like to ask @mcgilman or @markap14 their opinion if possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
