[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16813417#comment-16813417
]
Joseph Witt commented on NIFI-6157:
-----------------------------------
i think we should intentionally make these props have temp names. we do not
want random users using these as we dont know we will want to keep these. this
is to help us decide what the right values should be for a set of cases we can
vet. best case we need no props later and we learn more about a better way to
do this.
> StandardFunnel transferring too slowly
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-6157
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6157
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.9.0, 1.9.1
> Reporter: Brandon DeVries
> Assignee: Brandon DeVries
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> NIFI-6068 made modifications such that a funnel wouldn't hold on to a
> TimerDriven thread excessively. However, now it isn't holding on to the
> thread long enough...
> Since Funnels and Local Ports are scheduled with the timer driven thread
> pool, they're competing for threads with all of the other processors on the
> graph. In a large flow with a large number of processors, potentially with
> multiple assigned concurrent tasks, funnels and ports get to run less and
> less frequently, since they are hard coded to 1 concurrent task.
> I'm open to implementation options, but a couple of possibilities are:
> * Increase the transferred FlowFilecap from 10K to 100K. The thread will
> still be released if less than the requested 1000 FlowFiles are moved in a
> loop, so it won't hold on inappropriately, but it will still have the
> opportunity to move the files that need to be moved. Furthermore, if the
> back pressure on the outgoing relationship is engaged, it will cause the
> thread to be released. Effectively, the amount transferred would be limited
> by the max of 100K and outgoing queue capacity.
> * Like above, but add a property to specify the max number of FlowFiles
> transferred per run. Removing hard coded magic numbers is good... but
> cluttering nifi.properties is bad, so its a trade off.
> * Increase the number of concurrent threads for funnels / ports. This
> probably would want to be a configurable property, as the value should really
> likely be proportional to the "size" of your flow, whatever that means for
> the system in question.
> * Increase the "run duration"... but i don't think i like that.
> * If session.getQueueSize exceeds some threshold, spin off a new thread to
> transfer those files... but that could be dangerous.
> * Create a new thread pool for ports / funnels, so they aren't starved by
> processors. Similar to above, but reuses resources. Still would need to
> determine the correct size of the pool. This could be the best answer in
> theory, but would also require the most code work.
> [~markap14], thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
