[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16844728#comment-16844728
]
Daniel Bakai commented on MINIFICPP-864:
----------------------------------------
I think this is a good idea. The question in my mind is how we define a
dependency? Is it just a function that every extension can implement and is
guaranteed to execute in a synchronized block, or is it a more complicated
construct?
> Discuss possibility of having dependent operations be part of extension
> loading
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MINIFICPP-864
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-864
> Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Reporter: Mr TheSegfault
> Priority: Major
>
> [~bakaid] I've been thinking about what has been discussed on GH, and I'm
> wondering if we need to have the ability to load dependencies in a
> synchronous way at extension loading. We can formalize the interfaces to make
> this a key aspect of it, so that if a failure does occur we can possibly
> disable an extension and report on it.
>
> We can certainly have a continuity of operations provision in the
> configuration to dictate what can be done ( continue / fail ).
> Do you have any thoughts on this?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
