[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Payne updated NIFI-6369:
-----------------------------
    Assignee: Mark Payne
      Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> ValidateRecord routes JSON records to 'invalid' when validating a timestamp, 
> even if format is valid
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-6369
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6369
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Mark Payne
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If a JSON Reader (either JsonPath or JsonTree reader) is used with 
> ValidateRecord and the schema indicates that a field is a timestamp (e.g.,
> {"name": "timestamp", "type": \{"type": "long", 
> "logicalType":"timestamp-millis"}}
> ) with the JSON having a value like "2019/06/10 12:00:00Z" and a format of 
> "yyyy/MM/dd HH:mm:ss'Z'" The processor considers this invalid, even when 
> setting "strict type checking" to "false".
> This appears to be due to the way that ValidateRecord calls 
> RecordReader.nextReader() - it calls it "reader.nextRecord( /* coerce types 
> **/* false, /* drop unknown types **/* false)" 
> When this is called, the Record Reader checks the 'coerce types' flag and 
> determines that it should not coerce the string "2019/06/10 12:00:00Z" into a 
> timestamp. However, for any date/time/timestamp fields, if the value is a 
> String and it matches the configured pattern, the Record Readers should go 
> ahead and convert the value into the appropriate java.sql.Date, 
> java.sql.Time, java.sql.Timestamp object because that's clearly the intent of 
> the schema and formatting being applied.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to