markap14 commented on issue #3698: WIP: NIFI-6628: Separate out logging of 
extensions vs. nifi framework 
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3698#issuecomment-528984869
 
 
   @adarmiento Thanks for the PR! I went back & forth in my mind over what made 
sense here as far as configuring different elements. This PR goes the route of 
making the framework file the default, and then selectively choosing what goes 
into the app-log. But I think we have to go the other way. The app-log should 
be default, and then be selective about which packages we put into the 
framework log. This is because we processors/controller services/etc. do not 
just belong to the package "org.apache.nifi.processors". We have some that are 
just in "org.apache.nifi", some in "org.apache.nifi.json", etc., etc. And users 
can have their own custom processors, in a package of say "com.mycompany" and 
we don't want that going to the framework log. So we will need the default to 
remain the app-log and then select specific packages to put into the 
framework.log file. Does that make sense?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to