[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Koji Kawamura updated NIFI-6613:
--------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed
        Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

> When FlowFile Repository fails to update due to previous failure, it should 
> log the root cause
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-6613
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6613
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Mark Payne
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When the FlowFile Repository (more specifically, the LengthDelimitedJournal 
> of the write-ahead log) fails to update, it logs the reason. However, all 
> subsequent attempts to update the repo will first check if the repo is 
> 'poisoned' and if so throw an Exception. This gets logged as something like:
> {code:java}
> Failed to process session due to 
> org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.ProcessException: FlowFile Repository 
> failed to update: org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.ProcessException: 
> FlowFile Repository failed to 
> updateorg.apache.nifi.processor.exception.ProcessException: FlowFile 
> Repository failed to update    at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.repository.StandardProcessSession.commit(StandardProcessSession.java:405)
>     at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.repository.StandardProcessSession.commit(StandardProcessSession.java:336)
>     at 
> org.apache.nifi.processors.script.ExecuteScript.onTrigger(ExecuteScript.java:228)
>     at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.StandardProcessorNode.onTrigger(StandardProcessorNode.java:1165)
>     at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.tasks.ConnectableTask.invoke(ConnectableTask.java:203)
>     at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.scheduling.TimerDrivenSchedulingAgent$1.run(TimerDrivenSchedulingAgent.java:117)
>     at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)    at 
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308)    at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>     at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
>     at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>     at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)Caused by: java.io.IOException: 
> Cannot update journal file /flowfile_repository/journals/4614619461.journal 
> because this journal has already encountered a failure when attempting to 
> write to the file. If the repository is able to checkpoint, then this problem 
> will resolve itself. However, if the repository is unable to be checkpointed 
> (for example, due to being out of storage space or having too many open 
> files), then this issue may require manual intervention. {code}
> Because there may be many Processors attempting to update the repository, 
> this causes a lot of errors in the logs and makes it difficult to understand 
> the underlying cause. When the journal becomes "poisoned" we should hold onto 
> the Throwable that caused it and log it in this error message so that each 
> update indicates the root cause. This will make it much easier to track what 
> happened.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to