hunyadi-dev commented on a change in pull request #784:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/784#discussion_r435437097



##########
File path: extensions/script/python/ExecutePythonProcessor.cpp
##########
@@ -46,144 +50,177 @@ core::Relationship 
ExecutePythonProcessor::Failure("failure", "Script failures")
 void ExecutePythonProcessor::initialize() {
   // initialization requires that we do a little leg work prior to onSchedule
   // so that we can provide manifest our processor identity
-  std::set<core::Property> properties;
-
-  std::string prop;
-  getProperty(ScriptFile.getName(), prop);
-
-  properties.insert(ScriptFile);
-  properties.insert(ModuleDirectory);
-  setSupportedProperties(properties);
-
-  std::set<core::Relationship> relationships;
-  relationships.insert(Success);
-  relationships.insert(Failure);
-  setSupportedRelationships(std::move(relationships));
-  setAcceptAllProperties();
-  if (!prop.empty()) {
-    setProperty(ScriptFile, prop);
-    std::shared_ptr<script::ScriptEngine> engine;
-    python_logger_ = 
logging::LoggerFactory<ExecutePythonProcessor>::getAliasedLogger(getName());
+  if (getProperties().empty()) {
+    setSupportedProperties({
+      ScriptFile,
+      ScriptBody,
+      ModuleDirectory
+    });
+    setAcceptAllProperties();
+    setSupportedRelationships({
+      Success,
+      Failure
+    });
+    valid_init_ = false;
+    return;
+  }
 
-    engine = createEngine<python::PythonScriptEngine>();
+  python_logger_ = 
logging::LoggerFactory<ExecutePythonProcessor>::getAliasedLogger(getName());
 
-    if (engine == nullptr) {
-      throw std::runtime_error("No script engine available");
-    }
+  getProperty(ModuleDirectory.getName(), module_directory_);
 
-    try {
-      engine->evalFile(prop);
-      auto me = shared_from_this();
-      triggerDescribe(engine, me);
-      triggerInitialize(engine, me);
+  valid_init_ = false;
+  appendPathForImportModules();
+  loadScript();
+  try {
+    if ("" != script_to_exec_) {

Review comment:
       Due to [performance 
impact](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62081977/why-is-there-no-optimization-for-checking-for-empty-string-via-comparison)
 I went with replacing `"" ==` and `"" !=` with `.empty()` and `.size()` calls 
respectively.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to