[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

James Kosin updated OPENNLP-669:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: java_test_1.8.0.txt

Java 1.8.0 Test Results.

The discrepancy is in the third test for the perceptron.
Something happens in 1.8.0 and the perceptron out performs the 1.7.0 model 
training....


> Java 1.8 incompatibility and Build failures
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENNLP-669
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-669
>             Project: OpenNLP
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build, Packaging and Test, Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
>         Environment: Windows 8.1 Java 1.8
>            Reporter: James Kosin
>            Assignee: James Kosin
>              Labels: java1.8, java8
>             Fix For: 1.6.1
>
>         Attachments: java_test_1.7.0_51.txt, java_test_1.8.0.txt
>
>   Original Estimate: 504h
>  Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> I just wanted to let everyone know, the OpenNLP project is not compatible 
> with the new Java 1.8.
> I get two (2) issues:
> 1)    Fails test:
>    Failed tests:
> testPerceptronOnPrepAttachDataWithStepSizeDecrease(opennlp.tools
>    .ml.perceptron.PerceptronPrepAttachTest):
>    expected:<0.7756870512503095> but was:
>    <0.7766773953948998>
> 2)    Java document generation fails miserably.
>    [ERROR] *    <li>.bin --> the file is binary
>    [ERROR] ^
>    [ERROR]
> C:\Users\jkosin\Documents\Projects\OpenNLP\opennlp\opennlp-tools\src\mai
> n\java\opennlp\tools\ml\perceptron\SuffixSensitivePerceptronModelWriter.java:41:
>      error: bad use of '>'
>    [ERROR] *    <li>.bin --> the file is binary
>    [ERROR] ^
>    [ERROR]
> C:\Users\jkosin\Documents\Projects\OpenNLP\opennlp\opennlp-tools\src\mai
>    n\java\opennlp\tools\postag\POSModel.java:64: error: reference not found
> The second for javadoc errors are probably due to more stringent checking in 
> javadoc.
> The first... is a bit disconcerting and troubling.  I'm going to check into 
> this; because this error shouldn't be happening.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to