[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13950678#comment-13950678
]
James Kosin commented on OPENNLP-669:
-------------------------------------
I'll give that a try.
I do know Java 8 was a wide spread change with lambdas and all. Also fixed
some rounding issues; but, that doesn't affect our stuff.
The output of the other 3 tests don't show any differences for this one. The
Maxent models though are all different than with Java 7; but don't test those
as stringently for the outcomes.
The JavaDoc issues are fixed; though it produces a lot of warnings... for the
undocumented functions, parameters, returns, and exceptions.
> Java 1.8 incompatibility and Build failures
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENNLP-669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-669
> Project: OpenNLP
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build, Packaging and Test, Documentation
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Environment: Windows 8.1 Java 1.8
> Reporter: James Kosin
> Assignee: James Kosin
> Labels: java1.8, java8
> Fix For: 1.6.1
>
> Attachments: java_test_1.7.0_51.txt, java_test_1.8.0.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 504h
> Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> I just wanted to let everyone know, the OpenNLP project is not compatible
> with the new Java 1.8.
> I get two (2) issues:
> 1) Fails test:
> Failed tests:
> testPerceptronOnPrepAttachDataWithStepSizeDecrease(opennlp.tools
> .ml.perceptron.PerceptronPrepAttachTest):
> expected:<0.7756870512503095> but was:
> <0.7766773953948998>
> 2) Java document generation fails miserably.
> [ERROR] * <li>.bin --> the file is binary
> [ERROR] ^
> [ERROR]
> C:\Users\jkosin\Documents\Projects\OpenNLP\opennlp\opennlp-tools\src\mai
> n\java\opennlp\tools\ml\perceptron\SuffixSensitivePerceptronModelWriter.java:41:
> error: bad use of '>'
> [ERROR] * <li>.bin --> the file is binary
> [ERROR] ^
> [ERROR]
> C:\Users\jkosin\Documents\Projects\OpenNLP\opennlp\opennlp-tools\src\mai
> n\java\opennlp\tools\postag\POSModel.java:64: error: reference not found
> The second for javadoc errors are probably due to more stringent checking in
> javadoc.
> The first... is a bit disconcerting and troubling. I'm going to check into
> this; because this error shouldn't be happening.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
