[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17474360#comment-17474360
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on OPENNLP-1352:
-----------------------------------------
kinow commented on pull request #401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/401#issuecomment-1010769022
This is now ready for review. To review, one can look at the latest build on
my fork where the action has already run:
https://github.com/kinow/opennlp/actions/runs/1686590266
Note that the coverage is failing, but not failing the build. This is the
exact same behaviour from master. To confirm, you can open a recent pull
request (like the ONNX one), then go to checks, expand and click. There, find
the link to the build, and look at the raw logs.
It will contain something similar to this screenshot:
The time to start and complete the build was **a lot** faster than Travis CI
recent builds :+1:
Cheers,
Bruno
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Migrate from Travis CI to GH Actions?
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENNLP-1352
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1352
> Project: OpenNLP
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build, Packaging and Test
> Affects Versions: 1.9.3
> Reporter: Bruno P. Kinoshita
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Does anyone have any opinion on this? Travis CI seems to be quite slow now,
> both to start the tests, and also to run them.
> Migrating to GH Actions is now trivial. Other ASF projects have moved to
> Actions (Commons) or are using ASF infra (Jena).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
