[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17912243#comment-17912243
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on OPENNLP-1676:
-----------------------------------------

mawiesne opened a new pull request, #222:
URL: https://github.com/apache/opennlp-sandbox/pull/222

   Change
   -
   - tightens the paramter requirements of `Disambiguator` interface
   - tightens the paramter requirements of `FeaturesExtractor` class
   - adjusts implementation in related classes
   - adds required JUnit tests
   - removes `AbstractWSDisambiguator#setParams` method, as it can be done via 
a constructor allowing a final for this field
   
   Tasks
   -
   Thank you for contributing to Apache OpenNLP.
   
   In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
   to ensure the following steps have been taken:
   
   ### For all changes:
   - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
        in the commit message?
   
   - [x] Does your PR title start with OPENNLP-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
   
   - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically main)?
   
   - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
   
   ### For code changes:
   - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via `mvn 
clean install` at the root opennlp-sandbox folder?
   - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file in opennlp-sandbox folder?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found in opennlp-sandbox folder?
   
   ### For documentation related changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which 
it is rendered?
   
   ### Note:
   Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions for 
build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
   




> Add stricter argument validation in WSD component
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENNLP-1676
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1676
>             Project: OpenNLP
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wsd
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.1
>            Reporter: Martin Wiesner
>            Assignee: Martin Wiesner
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.5.4
>
>
> During work on OPENNLP-789, we discussed that a stricter validation of 
> (constructor or method) arguments should be conducted, see:
>  * [https://github.com/apache/opennlp-sandbox/pull/200#discussion_r1892551223]
>  * [https://github.com/apache/opennlp-sandbox/pull/200#discussion_r1892559517]
> This follow-up issue aims at improving the WSD API towards stricter checks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to