https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121585
Ariel Constenla-Haile <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Ariel Constenla-Haile <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #5) > mmh, replacing stlport with boost is not the option that comes into my mind > first. I think it makes more sense to switch to the compiler stl. And the > Google one would mean a new external dependency. std::unordered_map is a C++11 extension. So if using the compiler implementation, another container has to be chosen. I guess Pedro is trying to follow LO, the replaced stlport containers with boost's unordered ones: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-is-free-of-STLport-td2464453.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
