https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121701

[email protected] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---

--- Comment #6 from [email protected] ---
thanks for your time and effort!

XY-chart: 
the x values are given in column A. Calc "knows" this because it selects the
correct cells. Furthermore, in "data labels" it has the correct cells to take
the labels, yet ignores them when creating labels. The only thing empty there
is "X-values". I've now pointed that to the cells to look in, but now it
invents it's own date range, starting with 12/30/99 and ending with 08/22/01.
Ignoring my data is one thing, but inventing its own data?!

I don't know what you mean by specifying the ranges. I haven't specified any,
nor is that necessary: calc does that and the chart itself is created
correctly. It's just the labels that are incorrect. They should simply be
created according to the data used to plot the chart. In any case, I've told
calc to use the columns as of cell 4 instead of 2. Doesn't make any difference.

Line:
I don't know why the categories are empty now, they were there before. In any
case, I've now given it a range and now it uses many dates, so it becomes
messy. After tilting it 90 degrees it looks a bit better, but far from perfect.
Using scale would make it even better, but calc doesn't let me do that. 

I'm reopening the bug, because there are still errors in how calc handles the
charts:
XY-chart:
- calc should have understood before and should understand now where to take
the labels from.
- calc should not invent data out of thin air.

Line:
- calc should let me scale the x-axis, or improve the labels in some other way.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to