https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121585
--- Comment #14 from [email protected] --- Yes, the tmp_unordered.sh script was unfortunately skipped in the latest patch. It is the same one as in the patches predecessor. Using plain <unordered_*> includes instead of their "boosted" counterparts is preferable indeed. The same applies to direct uses of the boost namespace. If we want flexibility regarding the STL choice I suggest to extend the forwarding available from main/stlport/systemstl* to compiler provided tr1 stuff or to boost/libc++/sparsehash etc. In the first step I just wanted to make sure that we are really using the boost container headers instead of some other stuff loitering around. The build recipes for non-Linux platforms weren't updated yet. Once the tmp_unordered.sh script has settled we should open an extra branch and use it to bring in the other platforms one after the other. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
