https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114430
--- Comment #28 from Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> --- Hello; (In reply to comment #27) > Pedro, I suggest that you bring this to the dev list. For an informed > judgement we will need to examine: > - ODF Formula conformance > - Interoperability (especially with Microsoft Office) The change complies with both. I was even careful to mention IEEE 754 - 2008. > - Backwards compatibility 4.0 is the best time for doing this change. > - A proposed formulation for a sentence to put in the Release Notes for 4.0 When there is *somewhere* to add such note I will gladly do so. Now ... I am not spending my time on this, in fact I already unsubscribed from the -dev list to rest from confrontations with Rob. I think before reverting this (which *I* won't do): - A qualified mathematitian will have to explain why -0^-0 should be interpreted as 1 instead of NaN. - *specific* examples of functionality broken by this change must be provided. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
