https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114430
--- Comment #41 from Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #38) > > When I said I fixed all the issues, I meant I fixed ALL the issues. > > > > I think Rob is overreacting and should take the time to look at the patch > > before vetoing. > > #1 Since we agreed to not revert vetoed patches quickly, then it makes sense > to track the vetoes so they can be reverted when we get closer to a release. > I haven't agreed on anything. I think your act was brutal and against Apache policies and should be repaired. > #2 Your patch has: > > #define SAL_STRICTER_MATH > > So you are enabling the alternative behavior (non-backwards compatible) by > default. I am agnostic. I think some people may want the default behaviour while other want to be use the alternative option. With my patch people can decide during compile time. Ultimately I think it's the community that must take the decision (by voting) before the release. so feel free to submit the configure instrumentation and start a poll to see what should be the default behaviour. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
