https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121837
--- Comment #11 from Kay <[email protected]> --- @Fred's comment of 31-03-2013 Regarding CWSes, The last reasonable discussion we had on this was: http://markmail.org/message/n7lqij6rymm3k2fc So, we can not think about using a CWS approach. Ok, based on your comment. "There is a chance that 2.3.0 can be made better to emulate 1.8.0 persistence, but the better option is CWS. I must emphasize that this was developed over two years and was in good working order and ready for release for the last several months." I commend the amount of development that's already been put to this. And, it's good to hear it seems "ready for release for the last several months". If that's the case, why aren't we just using it? ...with the understanding that we will need to make changes on the AOO side. Any help gratefully appreciated of course. At any rate, I will grab your latest snapshot and go from there. Thanks for all your dedication. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
