https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=64447
--- Comment #11 from adah <[email protected]> --- Yes, it is possible to manually change the fonts to make them correct. In fact, that is what I have to do when preparing a well-typeset document with OpenOffice. The problem is: Why should I have to do this? I just want to apply a font setting (choose different fonts for Eastern and Western characters in Writer) to the whole document, and why should a symbol have different fonts applied just because what is before it (or its absence)? As a side note, I have seen enough Chinese ODF (or ODF-generated PDF) documents that suffer from this problem. The result is unacceptable for me. IMHO, this is a serious design flaw in OpenOffice. (In reply to Rainer Bielefeld from comment #10) > Reporter tells lots of observations, but for me it's difficult to find out > what observations might show a bug and what observations might not. > > My test with "AOO 4.0.0-Dev – German UI / German locale > [AOO400m3(Build:9702) - Rev. 1503709 (2013-07-17) ]" on German German WIN7 > Home Premium (64bit)", Common 4.0-dev User Profile, Asian language support > ant CTL enabled: > > 1. Open reporters sample document, Zoom -> 600% and observe word "test" in > second sentence > 2. click behind opening quotation mark before word "test" > > It will be shown as font "SimSun" (also see remark 'a' below!) > 3. click behind closing quotation mark behind word "test" > > It will be shown as font "Time New Roman" [snipped] > a) it's easy to distinguish opening quotation marks in "Time New Roman" and > "SimSun" (you can also compare with opening quotation mark in first > sentence): > Click behind opening quotation mark before word "test" in second sentence > and mark it, then change font from "SimSun" to "Time New Roman". You will > observe that the wide space between quotation mark and chinese character > before will disappear (related to "Bug 90389 - CJK punctuation compression > "?), and viewing is different, in "SimSun" the curve above the fat point at > the bottom of each of the 2 elements does not exceed the fat point to the > left -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
