https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123961
[email protected] <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ACCEPTED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] |g | Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from [email protected] <[email protected]> --- Thanks for the patch! Actually I'd prefer if the declaration was adjusted not to use const for non-reference/non-pointer types, because that is an implementation detail of the function which is irrelevant its users. Some compilers even warn about this. Does your compiler work when you remove the const from the non-reference/non-pointer types in the *hxx file? If the constness aspect is important it should go where it actually belongs: into the function definition (in the *cxx file). Does your compiler allow, that the declaration uses the non-const variant in the declaration and the const variant in the definition? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
