https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124385
--- Comment #4 from Ariel Constenla-Haile <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andre from comment #3) > I don't see how removing the 'published' keyword is a valid action, > especially for interfaces that exist for almost three years. Time as an argument is a non-sense, as OpenOffice.org 3.4 Beta (were this API was released) was "dead" until AOO 3.4.0 was released at the ASF, so you shouldn't count time, but releases. > Besides, bug 117329, explicitly states that the interfaces et al in question > should have the 'published' keyword. All of them are in the list of > interfaces attached to that issue. I don't see the mistake. Publishing the API in the same release were it was made available to the API users is obviously an error. I don't know how this list was generated, may be Jürgen who was in charge of the QA/verifying has an idea; I assume they grep'ed the IDL files, and as they had no @since tag, they were added to that list. Not as an argumentum ab auctoritate, but as a side note, LO reverted "publishing of lots of UNO types", including this Undo API, in http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=78cca63070ae6cf82b45ec3bc75fafa2db31a7f2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
