https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P5 Status|ACCEPTED |CONFIRMED Issue Type|DEFECT |ENHANCEMENT Component|code |scripting CC| |rainerbielefeld_ooo_qa@biel | |efeldundbuss.de Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] | |g Summary|BASIC:starbasic function |starbasic function cDate() |cDate() so slow as to be |from string 300 times |unuseable |slower than from numeric | |value OS|Windows XP |Windows, all --- Comment #5 from Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> --- Still Reproducible with server installation of "AOO 4.1.0-Beta – German UI / German locale - [AOO410m14(Build:9760) - Rev. 1573601 2014-03-03 17:47:48]" on German WIN7 Home Premium (64bit)", own separate user profile. Attached Macro calculates slow down factor if d date is given as string instead of numeric value It seems that situation might have been improved a little since 1.1.5, My results in Message Box with Various Versions: OOo 1.1.5: < 900 OOo 2.0.2 < 800 OOo 3.1.1 < 500 OOo 3.3.0 < 300 AOO 3.4.1 < 400 AOO 4.1.0 Beta < 300 But that might be illusion caused by "Bug 124445 - AOO Basic execution slow"? Currently we even do not know whether the core of cDate() causes the slow down or whether cDate() internally calls a string to number function if data is contributed as string and that string to number function causes the problem; or hwatever. I see only small priority for this one. Assignation back to default due to facts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
