https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124711
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> --- g1) Nobody will think that the text in the index will flash because the related field flashes. So of course if the the "Hidden" property style is a quite normal Font Effect it should be expected that it has no influence to the appearance in indexes. g2) But "Hidden" is different from "Relief" or similar. So "Hidden" Style for example will prevent the string from being found. String with that property does not need room in the text flow (g) So "Hidden" is a very special "Font Effect", may be even something different. Some "real life" examples where the effect can be used might help to decide whether g3) the assignment as a "Font effect" is misleading or whether (g4) "Hidden" should should be ignored for Index entries. Currently I can better imagine applications where I want to hide "Hidden" paragraphs completely, although I never used that feature. "Issue 49960 - Hidden sections also counted in outline numbering" is concerning something very different, but at least underpins a policy "hidden should mean really completely hidden. "Issue 111155 Comment 5 - Fields formatted as hidden text show in TOC/indexes": comment underpins that we do not have a bug here. "Issue 27377 - Character formatting not retained in entries of TOC, table lists, etc": I need to find though all those arguments, I doubt that CONFIRMED is appropriate for that general summary. I will try to find some more info in ODF specifications later. @hadouma: Is there a "real life" application where the current behavior causes problems? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
