https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125743
--- Comment #3 from Jim DeLaHunt <from.bugzilla_apa...@jdlh.com> --- @mroe: thanks for looking at this. You may be right, perhaps it's not a bug. But then, can we come up with words that describe the present behaviour? When an array formula expands the array in a scalar parameter like "row" or "column", in what way does it treat a 1-row vector differently from a 1-column vector? Is the behaviour when this vector is in the "row" parameter different from when it is in the "column" parameter? If so, why? And why does having a value 0 for the "row" or "column" parameter not give a complete column or row in the result? My expectation is that setting a parameter to 0 causes INDEX() to return a complete row or column. This is not happening in the array formula context. Maybe my expectation is wrong. But I don't see any written specification to tell me what I should expect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
